Touted as ‘gold mine’ for school trust, land swap in Bears Ears could fail as lawmakers eye monument lawsuit

A proposal to swap Utah state belief lands out of Bears Ears Nationwide Monument has been sidetracked within the Senate this week thanks partly to considerations that such a deal would undermine Utah’s anticipated authorized problem to the monument’s restoration.

Framed as a surefire win for Utah’s college belief, the commerce would put useful mineral-bearing federal lands within the arms of the Faculty and Institutional Belief Lands Administration, or SITLA, in alternate for the state’s 130,000 acres scattered across the monument. The swap additionally contains almost 30,000 acres elsewhere within the state.

The deal requires the Legislature’s approval, which might include the passage of HJR16. that invoice cleared the Home however has been denied a listening to within the Senate.

The joint decision has been strongly pushed by retiring SITLA director, David Ure, himself a former state senator, who believes the commerce would yield a whole bunch of tens of millions of {dollars} for the company’s beneficiaries.

For the previous three years, SITLA has been figuring out areas, largely within the West Desert and Uinta Basin, that it could like in alternate for its checkerboarded sections within the nationwide monument, which President Joe Biden final yr restored to its unique 1.35-million-acre boundary below the powers given presidents below the Antiquities Act.

“It is a gold mine for the varsity children to have the ability to seize the financial values all through the remainder of the state and hold rural Utah going,” Ure instructed the Home Schooling Committee final month.

However some lawmakers are involved such a decision is untimely since each parcel to be traded has but to be recognized, in keeping with the invoice’s Senate sponsor, Evan Vickers, R-Cedar Metropolis. And a sense persists that the land swap may very well be seen as legitimizing the expanded monument state leaders will search to revoke by a forthcoming lawsuit.

“We wish to be sure we don’t disrupt that,” he mentioned Tuesday.

Any trades of state land exceeding 500 acres require approval from the Legislature, which has at all times accredited giant, sophisticated trades that may take years to drag off.

Vickers advised it could be higher to carry the land deal again earlier than the Legislative Administration Committee as soon as SITLA and Bureau of Land Administration agree on all of the lands are to be traded.

“If we go that path, we might additionally make a advice to the governor to convene a particular session,” Vickers mentioned. “There are a number of paths that accomplish the identical factor.”

Underneath the steerage of Rep. Timothy Hawkes, R-Centerville, HJR16 cruised by the Home in a 48-23 vote, over the objections of some representatives who argued the swap hurts San Juan County, whose land base is essentially federal.

Buying and selling out SITLA’s sections scattered across the monument would additional beholden Utah’s largest and poorest county to the whims of the federal authorities, argued Rep. Phil Lyman, R-Blanding.

“Who controls the land, controls the economic system, they management the individuals,” Lyman mentioned. “In the event you take these sections … and transfer them to a extra ‘productive place,’ then in 20 years, you may take the youngsters out of that county and ship them to that extra productive place to get jobs. It’s not truthful.”

As a San Juan County commissioner in 2016, Lyman was a number one voice towards President Barack Obama’s designation of the Bears Ears monument and cheerleader for President Donald Trump’s dramatic discount the next yr.

“Once we speak about these college sections, they’re a birthright on the time of statehood [in 1896], not solely to the state, however to the areas that they have been put in,” Lyman mentioned. “They have been a dispersed sample and unfold throughout the state. If you get right into a county like we’ve got down in Garfield, Wayne, Kane and San Juan, these public lands counties, it truly is a security internet.”

SITLA’s sole mandate, nonetheless, is to “optimize” income from belief lands for the advantage of the varsity belief. The company has a fiduciary responsibility to commerce into extra worthwhile lands when the chance arises, in keeping with officers.

Whether or not or not there’s a massive monument designated over the lands encircling Bears Ears Buttes, a land commerce would lead to an enormous windfall for SITLA, in keeping with Hawkes and Ure.

“It’s laborious to develop them in any significant manner. The income that was derived from these lands final yr was lower than $80,000,” Hawkes mentioned. “So there’s not numerous worth in it. However the federal authorities is keen now to alternate on favorable phrases.”

Underneath the proposed commerce, SITLA would hand over all its holdings inside the monument, plus extra lands in Iron, Kane, San Juan, Tooele, and Uintah counties, totaling almost 160,000 acres, for BLM lands in 19 counties, together with San Juan.

In response to San Juan’s considerations about shedding SITLA acreage, Ure mentioned, the company reworked the deal as finest it might to amass some federal land there.

“It’s laborious down there as a result of the minerals they’ve should not essentially ready, or of nice sufficient power or density, that non-public enterprise desires to come back in there [and mine],” Ure mentioned. “If that they had, they’d have already been in there on the BLM floor.”

Underneath the deal’s present configuration, SITLA would commerce into 10,000 federal acres in San Juan County to determine buffers round uranium websites.

“As of final week, I gave Blanding about 1,600 acres proper across the outskirts in order that financial growth could be there as a substitute of getting BLM floor that’s laborious to barter with,” Ure instructed lawmakers. “Have we finished every part proper? Almost certainly not. However when you might have about 10 or 15 completely different bosses, it’s sort of laborious to get every part finished on the similar time.”

Utah man files lawsuit, saying officer tackled him, beat him as he was kneeling

Cody Greenland watches physique digicam video of his arrest in 2020 from his legal professional’s workplace in Salt Lake Metropolis on Tuesday. Greenland stated he was kneeling along with his arms within the air when he was tackled from behind with out provocation by an officer who ran up behind him. Greenland is now suing the American Fork Police Division. (Pat Reavy,

Estimated learn time: 6-7 minutes

AMERICAN FORK — Cody Greenland was uncertain what was taking place when three American Fork law enforcement officials abruptly converged on him with their Tasers drawn in a retailer parking zone.

In police physique digicam video, Greenland has a glance of shock on his face as he holds a bag of meals in a single hand and a bottle of Mountain Dew within the different. Greenland, nonetheless, complied with the instructions of officers, put his arms within the air and knelt on the bottom with each knees, although he continued to query what he had accomplished.

Only a few seconds later, a fourth American Fork police officer, D.T. Cannon — who had simply arrived on the scene, in response to courtroom paperwork — got here operating on the West Jordan man and tackled him from behind.

“I may really feel officer Cannon coming. I may hear his tools on him jiggling and I may really feel one thing coming. I do not know should you’ve ever been tackled with out pads or something — I bought hit within the backbone by his knee. It like knocked the wind out of me immediately. All I may consider was to inform them, ‘Cease!’ ‘Do not!’ And attempt to shield my face as a result of he was immediately punching me within the head and face,” Greenland recalled.

Greenland, whose face was bloodied each from being punched and hitting the pavement, stated that he nonetheless has a continuing ringing in his ears from the beating, has short-term reminiscence loss and has a tough time concentrating — and suffers from post-traumatic stress dysfunction. Greenland admits he has had struggles previously with dependancy, which has gotten him in hassle with the regulation. However he stated he has by no means been handled like that.

“I have been arrested previously. I do know what occurs when you do not comply. I did precisely what they had been asking, and I used to be attempting to get them to inform me what I might accomplished flawed,” he stated.

Tuesday, Greenland alongside along with his legal professional, Robert Sykes, introduced a federal lawsuit this week in opposition to Cannon, the American Fork Police Division, town, and several other different American Fork law enforcement officials. Greenland, 38, claims his constitutional rights had been violated by police, saying they used extreme drive, made an illegal seizure, and several other officers did not intervene and stop Cannon from attacking him.

The American Fork Police Division stated Tuesday it was simply studying of the lawsuit and didn’t instantly have a remark.

On April 17, 2020, Greenland had been kicked out of the house he was dwelling in and was looking for his girlfriend. She informed him she was procuring at Goal, 57 N. 700 West, in American Fork. Greenland bought a journey to the parking zone. He had all his belongings with him in a few duffle baggage and trash baggage.

He discovered his girlfriend’s automotive within the parking zone, however she was not there and the automotive was locked. Greenland left his baggage on the automotive and went to a close-by retailer. Within the meantime, police acquired a number of experiences of a person attempting to get into vehicles into the parking zone, in response to charging paperwork,

Greenland had simply exited a retailer after shopping for meals and was “armed with a bottle of Mountain Dew,” Sykes stated, and was strolling again to his girlfriend’s automotive when three officers converged on him. Sykes stated his consumer was not armed and was cooperative.

“There have been no aggressive assertion or actions,” he stated.

Based on charging paperwork, Greenland “assumed a defensive combating stance” and “wouldn’t obey officers’ instructions.” But in police physique digicam video he seems to be kneeling along with his arms within the air.

Within the video, moments after kneeling on the bottom, Cannon tackles Greenland. Greenland could be heard yelling repeatedly on the officers, “I am good” and “Cease!”

Surrounding officers twice deployed Tasers on him as they tried to place him in handcuffs. Greenland stored telling the officers, “Do not tase me no extra, dude,” and “Do not hit me like that man” whereas asking a number of occasions, “What am I being arrested for?”

“You guys hate me or one thing? Why do you hate me?” Greenland asks within the video recording.

“You are not criticism,” an officer is heard telling Greenland.

When Greenland states that he was being compliant, an officer is heard replying with an obscenity.

Greenland did have medication in his pockets and was finally charged in 4th District Courtroom with a number of counts of drug possession as properly and interfering with an arrest.

When he was arrested, American Fork police famous of their reserving affidavit that “Greenland pulled away from officers as they made preliminary contact. He then refused verbal instructions. Whereas officers tried to detain Greenland, he continued to withstand and was tased.”

Greenland stated Tuesday he was not resisting, however his pure intuition was to guard his face, after which he was hit with a Taser, inflicting him to briefly lose the use his arms.

“You are locking up on the similar time you are attempting to defend your self. You possibly can’t transfer your arms, you’ll be able to’t reply to what they’re telling you to do if you’re being tased like that and punched within the face and head on the similar time. I might say that he punched me 30 occasions,” he stated, whereas additionally including that certainly one of his arms was stomped on.

Regardless that police discovered Greenland had medication in his pockets, they’d no motive to go looking him, in response to Sykes. After the case went to courtroom, a movement was filed by Greenland’s protection legal professional for proof to be suppressed and the costs in opposition to him had been finally dismissed.

Greenland had a number of different circumstances pending in opposition to him at the moment. He admits he had medication on that day and that he had been combating dependancy for a few years. However that didn’t give police the best to deal with and use Tasers on him, he stated.

“I do know that my report appears dangerous. And as you’ll be able to see within the video, they did discover medication on me, which nonetheless would not justify them punching me within the face,” he stated.

Since that day two years in the past, Greenland stated he has turned his life round and is sober, which he stated he wanted to do first earlier than addressing his arrest. However he stated he knew as he was on the bottom that he’d sometime be in search of the physique digicam movies.

“As a result of I knew I hadn’t accomplished something flawed,” he stated. “Instantly, I knew it wasn’t proper.”

Within the movies, Greenland stated officers could be heard telling him that they consider the movies will present the alternative, that police had been justified of their actions.

“I suppose they’re simply attempting to defend themselves as a result of they know they’re flawed, which is normally just like the response from a baby or anyone after they inform a lie after they’ve accomplished one thing flawed. Anyone that is seen the video is aware of that I did not do something flawed, that I used to be doing what they had been asking me to do.

“I may need been scared, however I wasn’t attempting to assault them,” he stated.

Extra tales you could be desirous about

Prince Andrew Served With Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Filed By Virginia Giuffre

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, has been served with a sexual assault lawsuit filed towards him by considered one of Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers, in response to New York federal court docket data.

Andrew is being sued within the US District Courtroom for the Southern District of New York by Virginia Giuffre, 38, who alleges the duke sexually abused her on a number of events in New York, London, and on Epstein’s personal island within the US Virgin Islands between 2000 and 2002 when she was below the age of 18.

The duke has repeatedly denied having intercourse with Giuffre, most notably in a disastrous November 2019 BBC interview through which he tried to defend himself, claiming to have by no means met her. Shortly after the interview aired, Andrew introduced that he was “stepping again” from royal public duties.

The affidavit of service filed Friday states {that a} member of Andrew’s safety crew formally acquired discover of the lawsuit towards him at his house, Royal Lodge on the grounds of Windsor Fort, on Aug. 27.

Within the affidavit, Cesar Augusto Sepulveda mentioned that it took him two days to ship the paperwork as a result of on his first try on Aug. 26, Andrew’s safety crew instructed him that they’d been instructed to not settle for service of any court docket course of or “enable anybody attending there for the aim of serving court docket course of onto the grounds of the property.”

When he returned the following day, Sepulveda met with Andrew’s head of safety, who instructed him he may go away the paperwork with one of many Royal Lodge guards and they’d be forwarded to the duke’s authorized crew. The pinnacle of safety refused to permit Sepulveda to serve Andrew in individual.

The paperwork record London-based prison protection legal professional Gary Bloxsome because the duke’s lawyer. BuzzFeed Information reached out to Bloxsome for touch upon the affidavit of service and the doc’s declare that his safety crew had been instructed to not obtain court docket paperwork. He didn’t reply.

Nonetheless, in response to ABC Information, Bloxsome reportedly questioned the legality of the service and known as Giuffre’s authorized crew’s actions “regrettable” in a letter obtained by the community. Within the doc, which ABC Information mentioned was despatched by Bloxsome to British judicial official senior grasp Barbara Fontaine on Sept. 6, the lawyer claimed that the best way through which the lawsuit was served makes the service invalid below British legislation.

“Absent being glad of some excellent cause to take action, our shopper is extremely unlikely to be ready to comply with any type of various service whereas the method to service of those proceedings stays irregular and the viability of the declare stays open to doubt,” Bloxsome reportedly wrote.

The primary pretrial convention will happen just about through phone on Monday. It’s unclear whether or not legal professionals representing Andrew will take part in any respect, as no paperwork have been filed in federal court docket in his protection.

A lawsuit threatens drastic cut to UC Berkeley’s fall enrollment : NPR

A lawsuit from offended neighbors threatens U.C. Berkeley with having to chop enrollment by a 3rd to cut back environmental impression, and dropping $57 million. It is now as much as the state supreme court docket.


A lawsuit threatens to chop UC Berkeley’s fall enrollment by a 3rd. Now the college is asking California’s Supreme Courtroom to step in. In the meantime, the college needs to ship out acceptance letters whereas it appeals the enrollment freeze. Sarah Hosseini from member station KQED has the story.

SARAH HOSSEINI: Seventeen-year-old Aniyah Story, an Oakland Excessive Faculty senior, is making an attempt to resolve the place to go to varsity.

ANIYAH STORY: Each time I see, like, a school in my e mail, I get actually excited as a result of it is round that point the place selections come out. So let me see if I can discover it.

HOSSEINI: She comes throughout as sharp, passionate and concerned. So it is not laborious to think about her inbox filled with acceptance letters. Amongst her high picks, proper on her dwelling turf, is UC Berkeley. However the letter from them says…

STORY: It says, we need to thanks for contemplating UC Berkeley. After which they form of clarify the scenario.

HOSSEINI: …In brief, that her odds simply bought slimmer.

STORY: I felt simply form of like my probabilities simply form of slipped away from me.

HOSSEINI: A 2019 lawsuit by neighbors of the UC Berkeley campus has resulted in a choose chopping incoming enrollment by about 30%. Just a few blocks away from the UC Berkeley campus, retiree Phil Bokovoy lives in a giant home on a large road with views of the hills. Within the final 20 years, enrollment at his alma mater grew by 40%. He says the neighborhood has modified loads since then.

PHIL BOKOVOY: Housing displacement, noise, elevated waste – and I actually am unhappy at what we have misplaced in Berkeley, and that is why I have been main our neighborhood’s efforts to carry the college accountable.

HOSSEINI: Bokovoy is president of Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods, the group that filed the unique lawsuit along with town of Berkeley.

BOKOVOY: This home throughout the road used to have a household that lived there, with youngsters, and it was what we name a mini dorm. And two homes up right here, there’s 14 college students residing in 2,500 sq. ft.

HOSSEINI: Bokovoy says earlier than Cal accepts extra college students, it wants to offer housing for those it already has. Ten p.c of Berkeley’s college students reported they’d skilled homelessness whereas on the school in a 2017 survey. Cal finally agreed to pay town $83 million, and town withdrew from the go well with. However the neighbors endured, and in August, the court docket required the college to freeze enrollment at 2020 ranges. A choose stated it wants to check and handle the increasing pupil physique’s environmental impacts on town at giant, one thing he stated it repeatedly didn’t do. Now Cal is asking the state Supreme Courtroom to pause that cap whereas it appeals. Cal spokesman Dan Mogulof.

DAN MOGULOF: We’re within the course of proper now of exploring each conceivable choice to mitigate the choice if it may possibly’t be reversed.

HOSSEINI: Mogulof says the college is making an attempt to construct extra housing, however these sorts of authorized challenges sluggish issues down. In the meantime, he says admitting fewer freshmen would price the college about $57 million, doubtlessly limiting monetary support for low-income college students and shrinking class choices.

MOGULOF: We all know how laborious these 1000’s of scholars have labored with a purpose to achieve entry into Berkeley, and we do not need to allow them to down.

HOSSEINI: Mogulof says the college is contemplating partnering with different faculties and inspiring college students to graduate or take their programs on-line. Late final week, Gov. Gavin Newsom joined Cal in asking the state Supreme Courtroom to remain the choose’s order. Whereas all that is happening, Oakland Excessive Faculty senior Aniyah Story is aware of she would not have way more time to resolve the place she’s going to high school.

STORY: And it is simply very emotional about it, as a result of this can be a college that I am very occupied with going to, that a whole lot of my buddies and classmates are occupied with going to.

HOSSEINI: UC Berkeley is urging the Supreme Courtroom to behave shortly so we will let 1000’s of would-be college students like story know what’s attainable by the tip of March. For NPR information, I am Sarah Hosseini in Berkeley.

Copyright © 2022 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at for additional data.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content is probably not in its ultimate kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability could differ. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.