US rules out Ukraine no-fly zone after Zelenskyy appeal | Russia-Ukraine crisis News


After Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s attraction, US says measure can be step in direction of direct battle with Russia.

The US has dominated out implementing a “no-fly zone”  on Russian plane over Ukraine after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy urged Western nations to contemplate such a measure to cease any additional bombardment by Russia.

In a video deal with, Zelenskyy stated Russia had launched 56 rocket strikes and fired 113 cruise missiles prior to now 5 days for the reason that begin of the conflict on February 24.

Zelenskyy, who didn’t specify how and by whom a no-fly zone can be enforced, accused Russia of committing conflict crimes and stated it ought to be introduced earlier than a world tribunal.

He additionally stated Russia had continued to bombard Ukrainian cities throughout a primary spherical of talks with Ukrainian officers in Belarus on Monday.

“I imagine that Russia is making an attempt to use stress on this unsubtle means. Don’t waste time. We don’t settle for such techniques. Truthful negotiations can happen when one aspect doesn’t hit the opposite aspect with rocket artillery on the very second of negotiations,” he stated.

INTERACTIVE Russia-Ukraine map Who controls what in Ukraine DAY 6

However Washington, which has promised army assist, rejected the decision to determine a no-fly zone, saying it could be a step in direction of a direct battle between the USA and Russia.

“The president has been very clear that he’s not aspiring to ship US troops to combat a conflict with Russia,” White Home spokesperson Jen Psaki stated on Monday.

“And I believe what’s vital to notice right here is that’s primarily what this could be a step towards, as a result of a no-fly zone would require implementation,” she added.

“It could require deploying US army to implement which might be a direct battle, a doubtlessly direct battle, and doubtlessly conflict with Russia, which is one thing we aren’t planning to be part of.”

Greater than 500,000 individuals have fled Ukraine, based on the United Nations, setting off a refugee disaster with hundreds additionally awaiting passage at seven European border crossings.

At the least 102 civilians in Ukraine have been killed for the reason that invasion began, however the true determine might be a lot greater, the UN stated on Monday.

Refugee movement from Ukraine to neighboring countries(Al Jazeera)

What Are the Rules for Celebrities Promoting NFTs?


This January, actress Mila Kunis videoconferenced with Mark Zuckerberg’s sister Randi Zuckerberg to debate her NFT challenge, “Stoner Cats,” as just a few thousand viewers watched from residence. The dialog was a part of a web-based occasion held by the brand new crypto-for-ladies group MyBFF. All night, speaker after speaker had confused how savvy ladies ought to leap into the world of Web3 shortly, earlier than males snatched up all of the riches. However Kunis took a beat to throw in a caveat. “I don’t ever need individuals going into NFTs pondering it’s an funding,” she mentioned. “Go into it since you like it, since you assume it’s stunning, as a result of it brings you pleasure.” Then she talked about, off-handedly, that, additionally, the Securities and Trade Fee would “go after” them in the event that they have been presenting NFTs like an funding. It was a stunning admission—within the booming world of movie star NFT shilling, there barely seems to be any regulation in any respect.

Celebrities love NFTs. Some well-known sorts have launched their very own tasks, like Quentin Tarantino, who’s promoting NFTs based mostly on his authentic Pulp Fiction screenplay. Others like to attract consideration to tasks they’ve backed, just like the Bored Ape Yacht Membership. Gwyneth Paltrow, Eminem, Steve Aoki, Jimmy Fallon, Paris Hilton, Shaquille O’Neal, Publish Malone, The Chainsmokers, DJ Khaled, Future, Snoop Dogg, Lil Child, Mark Cuban, Steph Curry, and Serena Williams have all posted about their apes; Timbaland each owns a BAYC NFT and has launched a manufacturing firm for BAYC house owners.

Justin Bieber, in the meantime, posted about a picture of a Bored Ape on Instagram in January, and now has two in his digital pockets, though it’s unclear whether or not he really paid for them personally or in reality owns them in any respect. (Bieber didn’t reply to requests for remark.) The pseudonymous weblog Soiled Bubble Media has been documenting a number of the weirdness surrounding the movie star NFT push, tracing blockchain motion to theorize that some celebrities might have extra of a monetary stake within the NFTs they’re selling than they let on, together with Bieber. Was he paid to advertise a number of the NFTs he has posted about, both with free NFTs or common outdated American {dollars}?

We don’t know proper now. However say a hypothetical movie star have been to simply accept a free NFT in alternate for selling it. If that is so, the Federal Commerce Fee’s present tips about social media promotions ought to apply, in line with Bonnie Patten, the chief director of client advocacy group Reality in Promoting. “The regulation is obvious that in case you are gifted an merchandise that you just then promote, you’re required to obviously and conspicuously disclose that materials connection,” she says. Ethan Wall, a lawyer specializing in authorized points associated to social media, agrees. “The identical guidelines that apply to influencers that receives a commission to advertise services additionally apply to NFTs,” he says. The hypothetical movie star must disclose they have been selling a product in a lot the identical manner they must affix “#advert” or different disclosures to social media posts.

What about if a star have been to obtain a free NFT from a 3rd social gathering group, maybe some type of concierge service or advertising and marketing company appearing as a middle-man? Identical deal—the present tips also needs to apply. Robert Weissman, the president of client advocacy group Public Citizen, believes that the underlying ideas of the FTC’s endorsement tips are clear, though they weren’t written with the convoluted world of NFTs in thoughts. “One of many core ideas is that folks have a proper to know when they’re being marketed to,” Weissman says. “There’s an obligation on advertisers and endorsers to make affirmative disclosures to this impact, when shoppers wouldn’t usually know they’re being marketed to.”

So will the FTC implement its guidelines towards celebrities and influencers who look like selling NFTs with out correctly disclosing their monetary stake? It’s unclear, and the FTC declined to touch upon its method to NFT regulation.



3,000 NYC staff face job loss over vaccine rules


Lots of the 3,000 unvaccinated have been on unpaid go away for the reason that mandate went into impact final autumn. Roughly 1,000 different workers, who have been employed after the mandate was introduced and had agreed to get the jabs, danger dropping their positions Friday in the event that they fail to submit proof of vaccination.

Jennifer Sey quit a top job at Levi’s to speak freely about COVID rules : NPR


Former Levi’s government Jennifer Sey speaks at a convention in 2018.

Lintao Zhang/Getty Photos for The Enterprise of Trend


conceal caption

toggle caption

Lintao Zhang/Getty Photos for The Enterprise of Trend


Former Levi’s government Jennifer Sey speaks at a convention in 2018.

Lintao Zhang/Getty Photos for The Enterprise of Trend

Within the spring of 2020, firstly of the coronavirus pandemic, Jennifer Sey took a hard-line, controversial place: Colleges ought to keep open.

On the time, Sey was chief advertising officer at Levi Strauss & Co., with 21 years on the firm. Later within the 12 months, Sey obtained promoted to Levi’s model president — on a path to doubtlessly turn into the following CEO. As an alternative, she has now resigned.

“Finally,” Sey advised NPR, “nearly a month in the past, the CEO mentioned to me, ‘There’s simply not a path for you right here.’ You recognize, ‘It is all an excessive amount of.’ “

Sey’s resignation made a giant splash, as she mentioned she walked away from a $1 million exit package deal, which might sometimes embrace a nondisclosure settlement. Levi’s says no such supply was formally made. Both means, Sey’s exit has prompted massive questions on firms and speech.

The place is the road between private {and professional} opinions? And is that line totally different for high-level executives?

Private model vs. firm model

Sey had constructed her private model round outspokenness: She’s a former elite gymnast who has written a e-book and produced a documentary about abuses within the sport.

Throughout the pandemic, Sey took to Twitter, op-eds and native TV, talking out in opposition to shutdowns of faculties and playgrounds. She wrote concerning the affect of distant studying on college students and ultimately opposed masks mandates for kids altogether.

“I used to be at all times very cautious. Levi’s was not in my public profile,” Sey says. “I used to be talking as a mother of 4, a public faculty mother of 4.” Generally, she spoke as a resident of San Francisco, the place Levi’s relies. Sey acknowledges her skilled job was representing the Levi’s model, although she says she’s a mother and a baby advocate earlier than being a enterprise government.

However is it potential for prime executives to wall off a private marketing campaign from their firm’s picture?

“It is such a high-powered place, most individuals is not going to separate it out,” says Americus Reed, who research manufacturers and social identification on the College of Pennsylvania. “You’ll be able to’t actually be a C-suite particular person as of late and have a totally separate private model.”

Controversial interviews

Final spring, decided to ship her children to in-person faculty, Sey moved from San Francisco to Denver. And she or he filmed extra interviews: with writer and anti-vaccine campaigner Naomi Wolf and with Fox Information host Laura Ingraham, who has forged doubt on COVID-19 vaccines and measures. Sey did not focus on vaccines and says she’s absolutely vaccinated, however her selection of platform escalated controversy.

Levi’s workers started to complain to human assets and company leaders, Sey says, whereas posts on social media started calling for Levi’s to fireplace her and for customers to boycott the model. A number of the outcry Sey confronted was over her husband’s anti-vaccination tweets, with which Sey says she disagrees.

On the similar time, Sey describes receiving many messages of assist from Levi’s staff. And so she by no means stopped her public commentary on COVID-19 restrictions for kids.

She additionally stayed concerned in a marketing campaign to recall members of the San Francisco Board of Training, largely over prolonged faculty closures. The push ended this month with a landslide metropolis vote to oust three faculty board members.

Levi’s personal political positions

A key a part of the story is Levi’s personal historical past of political speech. The denim firm is a storied American model that has advocated for homosexual rights, immigrants, sure gun management measures and, most not too long ago, voting rights.

“You have to be constant,” says Charles Elson, a company governance and ethics professional on the College of Delaware. “On the one hand, they took robust positions on sure social points, with which many within the firm may disagree. But they punished her for successfully doing the identical factor.”

Levi’s spokesman Ancel Martinez, in an announcement to NPR, argues Sey’s case was not considered one of “stifling dissent,” noting that the corporate had supported Sey’s private advocacy earlier than.

“Jen went far past calling for varsity re-openings, continuously utilizing her platform to criticize public well being pointers and denounce elected officers and authorities scientists,” Martinez says. “As a prime government, her phrases and actions successfully undermined the corporate’s well being and security insurance policies, creating confusion and concern amongst workers.”

Bitter finish

When a few of San Francisco’s non-public colleges started reopening in late 2020, Sey says she made a pitch for Levi’s to take a stand alongside her: to assist San Francisco public colleges reopen.

Firm leaders turned her down, she says, although it wasn’t acrimonious. She says they argued that Levi’s would not weigh in on native points and that advocating for reopening public colleges could be unseemly since kids of many executives attended non-public colleges.

Levi’s hasn’t commented on this or different specifics of its discussions with Sey.

A few 12 months later, in late 2021, Sey acquired particular directions from human assets about matters she ought to depart alone, such because the California governor recall vote, vaccine mandates and the motives of pharma firms. She says her public statements within the media and on-line had been often tracked and assessed.

For some time, Sey felt her bosses had her again — till they did not.

“There was a way that I might misplaced the flexibility to steer inside the group as a result of so many workers had been so upset by the issues I had mentioned,” Sey says.

Elson and Reed each say this will get to the guts of the massive query: What’s the position of right this moment’s company chief? Elson argues it is to make high quality items at first rate costs — not wade into politics. However firms are more and more taking stands on social and political points, inevitably colliding with the views of some workers.

Reed notes that Sey made the one selection accessible to a employee on such a collision course: She left. As Sey sees it, she gained the last word freedom: to talk freely.

Google Eases Pandemic Rules for U.S. Employees


As Google prepares to deliver staff again to its workplaces, the corporate is enjoyable a few of its Covid-19 office insurance policies, together with a rule requiring U.S. workers to be vaccinated. However staff will nonetheless need to be vaccinated in the event that they plan to make use of the corporate’s workplaces.

In an electronic mail to San Francisco Bay Space workers final week, Google stated it was easing a few of its pandemic restrictions. It is going to not require workers to be examined weekly to enter its U.S. workplaces. Additionally, it is not going to require workers to put on masks within the workplace, excluding Santa Clara County — residence to Google’s important Mountain View headquarters.

Google additionally stated it deliberate to revive lots of its famed workplace facilities, similar to health facilities, cafeterias, therapeutic massage providers and commuter shuttles. CNBC reported the change in insurance policies earlier.

“Based mostly on present situations within the Bay Space, we’re happy that our workers who select to return in now have the power to entry extra on-site areas and providers,” Google wrote in a press release.

Individually, the corporate has dropped its requirement that U.S. workers present proof of vaccination standing or apply for a medical or spiritual exemption, Lora Lee Erickson, a Google spokeswoman, stated.

Final 12 months, Google stated workers who failed to take action could be positioned on administrative depart and might be fired ultimately. Ms. Erickson didn’t clarify why the corporate had modified its place.

Like many firms, Google has needed to adapt its insurance policies to the ceaselessly altering situations of the pandemic. It has repeatedly pushed again plans for when it is going to ask workers to start out engaged on a hybrid schedule that mixes distant work and in-office time.

Google’s workplaces are a key part to its work tradition, and the corporate has resisted going totally distant like different know-how firms.

As an alternative of a worldwide mandate, Google has repeatedly stated it is going to permit completely different areas to find out when to start out requiring staff to return in just a few instances per week. In the USA, Google stated, it’s nonetheless assessing the suitable time to start its hybrid work schedule and hasn’t set a date for staff to return to the workplace.

Whereas returning to the workplace remains to be voluntary, Google stated about 30 % of its Bay Space workers got here into the workplace final week.