Structural basis for mismatch surveillance by CRISPR–Cas9


  • Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome modifying in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering utilizing CRISPR/Cas methods. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. et al. Excessive-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR–Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822–826 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Doudna, J. A. The promise and problem of therapeutic genome modifying. Nature 578, 229–236 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. et al. Engineered CRISPR/Cas9 enzymes enhance discrimination by slowing DNA cleavage to permit launch of off-target DNA. Nat. Commun. 11, 3576 (2020).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Luk, Okay., Wolfe, S. A. & Kim, J. S. Evaluating and enhancing goal specificity of gene-editing nucleases and deaminases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 191–220 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaymaker, I. M. & Gaudelli, N. M. Engineering Cas9 for human genome modifying. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 69, 86–98 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Excessive-fidelity CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target results. Nature 529, 490–495 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. S. et al. Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR–Cas9 concentrating on accuracy. Nature 550, 407–410 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaymaker, I. M. et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351, 84–88 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. et al. Prediction of the sequence-specific cleavage exercise of Cas9 variants. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1328–1336 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. H., Lafrance, B., Kaplan, M. & Doudna, J. A. Conformational management of DNA goal cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9. Nature 527, 110–113 (2015).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. et al. Mechanisms of improved specificity of engineered Cas9s revealed by single-molecule FRET evaluation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 347–354 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F. et al. Constructions of a CRISPR–Cas9 R-loop advanced primed for DNA cleavage. Science 351, 867–871 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A. & Jinek, M. Structural foundation of PAM-dependent goal DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513, 569–573 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering utilizing the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagdas, Y. S., Chen, J. S., Sternberg, S. H., Doudna, J. A. & Yildiz, A. A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao0027 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. et al. Cryo-EM constructions reveal coordinated area motions that govern DNA cleavage by Cas9. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 679–685 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cofsky, J. C., Soczek, Okay. M., Knott, G. J., Nogales, E. & Doudna, J. A. CRISPR–Cas9 bends and twists DNA to learn its sequence. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.06.459219 (2021).

  • Pacesa, M. & Jinek, M. Mechanism of R-loop formation and conformational activation of Cas9. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.16.460614 (2021).

  • Jones, S. Okay. et al. Massively parallel kinetic profiling of pure and engineered CRISPR nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 84–93 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, G. Construction and dynamics of the CRISPR–Cas9 catalytic advanced. J. Chem. Inf. Mannequin. 59, 2394–2406 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Catalytic-state construction and engineering of Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9. Nat. Catal. 3, 813–823 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinek, M. et al. Constructions of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science 343, 1247997 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Steitz, T. A. & Steitz, J. A. A normal two-metal-ion mechanism for catalytic RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 90, 6498–6502 (1993).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalino, L., Nierzwicki, Ł., Jinek, M. & Palermo, G. Catalytic mechanism of non-target DNA cleavage in CRISPR–Cas9 revealed by ab initio molecular dynamics. ACS Catal. 10, 13596–13605 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldag, P. et al. Probing the steadiness of the SpCas9–DNA advanced after cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 12411–12421 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, S., Yu, H. H., Johnson, Okay. A. & Taylor, D. W. DNA unwinding is the first determinant of CRISPR–Cas9 exercise. Cell Rep. 22, 359–371 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Solar, W. et al. Constructions of Neisseria meningitidis Cas9 complexes in catalytically poised and anti-CRISPR-inhibited states. Mol. Cell 76, 938–952 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal construction of Cas9 in advanced with information RNA and goal DNA. Cell 156, 935–949 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq allows genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–198 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuscu, C., Arslan, S., Singh, R., Thorpe, J. & Adli, M. Genome-wide evaluation reveals traits of off-target websites sure by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 677–683 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangerfield, T. L., Huang, N. Z. & Johnson, Okay. A. Excessive throughput quantification of quick nucleic acid samples by capillary electrophoresis with automated knowledge processing. Anal. Biochem. 629, 114239 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Okay. A. Kinetic Evaluation for the New Enzymology (KinTek, 2019).

  • Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography utilizing strong prediction of specimen actions. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. CryoSPARC: algorithms for fast unsupervised cryo-EM construction dedication. Nat. Strategies 14, 290–296 (2017).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Strategies 17, 1214–1221 (2020).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: construction visualization for researchers, educators, and builders. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidmose, R. T. et al. Namdinator—automated molecular dynamics versatile becoming of structural fashions into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps. IUCrJ 6, 526–531 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a bodily reasonable surroundings for mannequin constructing into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 519–530 (2018).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pausch, P. et al. DNA interference states of the hypercompact CRISPR–CasΦ effector. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 652–661 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X. et al. Structural foundation for 2 metal-ion catalysis of DNA cleavage by Cas12i2. Nat. Commun. 11, 5241 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal construction of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Cell 162, 1113–1126 (2015).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Biden Puts Surveillance Advertising on Notice


    If the leaders of Large Tech platforms thought geopolitics would take the warmth off their firms throughout Joe Biden’s first State of the Union deal with, they had been mistaken. In a speech that coated loads of floor, the president took time to scold social media firms for what he referred to as “the nationwide experiment they’re conducting on our kids for revenue.” Biden referred to as on Congress “to strengthen privateness protections, ban focused promoting to kids, demand tech firms cease accumulating private information on our kids.”

    Although it was only a passing reference, Biden’s name to ban focused promoting to kids—which generated noticeable applause—was one thing of a milestone. Regulating focused promoting was not even near a mainstream thought till fairly lately. Now it’s within the State of the Union.

    Not way back, the highest-profile instance of federal lawmakers addressing internet advertising was when Orrin Hatch requested Mark Zuckerberg, in the course of the CEO’s first-ever look earlier than Congress, how Fb made cash from a free product. Zuckerberg went viral for deadpanning: “Senator, we run advertisements.”

    Hatch truly knew Fb bought advertisements; he was feigning ignorance for rhetorical impact, as lawmakers typically do throughout hearings. Irrespective of. The change went viral as a supposed instance of how out of contact Congress was when it got here to expertise. Fb staff wore T-shirts with Zuckerberg’s phrase printed on them. Take a look at these previous geezers: They don’t even know the way social media firms make cash. How will they ever regulate them?

    As lately as two years in the past, Congress hadn’t made a lot progress on that entrance. In a March 2020 piece titled, “Why Don’t We Simply Ban Focused Promoting?” I wrote a few small group of thinkers who had been starting to publicly attribute a litany of ills to the follow of monitoring customers to serve them personalised commercials. Most clearly, this consists of virtually something having to do with on-line privateness abuses. When a Catholic priest was fired for frequenting homosexual bars, for instance, it was due to his employers utilizing geotargeting information from Grindr that exists primarily to assist goal advertisements. However microtargeted promoting can be linked to different issues. It diverts advert income away from the organizations that create media content material and towards the aggregator platforms that preserve essentially the most intensive recordsdata on customers. And it arguably turbocharges the incentives of platforms like Fb, Instagram, and YouTube to optimize relentlessly for person engagement.

    However small was the operative phrase to explain that group of critics: a lawyer right here, a professor there. There was little indication that they’d made headway with the individuals who may truly impact change. Congress had spent two years arguing about what to do with Large Tech, significantly social media. However its members had paid vanishingly little consideration to the enterprise mannequin that drives it.

    That’s now not the case. Over the previous yr, lawmakers have began to zero in on the promoting mannequin that sustains social media platforms, which is more and more known as “surveillance promoting,” a time period that captures not simply the concentrating on, however the data-gathering that the concentrating on requires. (That is thanks partially to a push by an advocacy group referred to as Ban Surveillance Promoting, which launched in March 2021.) “The issue’s with the enterprise mannequin,” mentioned congressmember Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) at a listening to in December. “One that’s designed to draw consideration, accumulate, and analyze what retains that spotlight, and place advertisements.” And so, he requested, “Ought to we limit focused promoting?” In January, Home members Anna Eshoo (D-CA) and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), together with Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), launched the Banning Surveillance Promoting Act. That very same month, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) launched a bipartisan invoice to manage the web advert market extra just like the inventory market, instantly difficult Google’s present standing as major purchaser, vendor, and market for focused advertisements.

    After Paris Attacks, CIA Head Reignites Surveillance Debate | United States of Secrets | FRONTLINE


    Simply three days after the bloody assault in Paris, America’s prime intelligence official took to a podium and instructed that current leaks about categorised surveillance applications have been partially accountable.

    “Unauthorized disclosures” have led to “numerous hand-wringing over the federal government’s position within the effort to attempt to uncover these terrorists,” mentioned CIA director John Brennan in remarks on Monday. “There have been some coverage and authorized and different actions … that make our potential collectively, internationally, to search out these terrorists rather more difficult, and I do hope that that is going to be a get up name.”

    Brennan didn’t point out Edward Snowden by title. However the paperwork the previous NSA contractor leaked to journalists in 2013 revealed  simply how a lot knowledge the U.S. collects on foreigners and People alike.  He uncovered two categorised applications — Part 215 of the Patriot Act, which collects phone data in bulk, and Part 702, which authorizes spying on non-U.S. residents.

    U.S. officers have mentioned that the disclosures have endangered nationwide safety by encouraging terrorists to make use of encrypted messaging programs and software program to hide their identities on-line, a degree Brennan underscored on Monday.

    “There was a major enhance within the operational safety of a variety of these operatives and the terrorist networks as they’ve gone to high school on what it’s they should do to maintain their actions hid from the authorities,” Brennan mentioned in remarks on the Middle for Strategic and Worldwide Research. “As I discussed, there are numerous technological capabilities which are accessible proper now that make it exceptionally troublesome each technically in addition to legally for intelligence safety companies to have the perception they should uncover it.”

    Brennan’s remarks reignited a long-running debate on the steadiness between civil liberties and nationwide safety, which gained momentum worldwide after Snowden revealed the lengthy attain of U.S. surveillance.

    However privateness advocates be aware that terrorists have been conscious lengthy earlier than Snowden that the U.S. authorities has the flexibility to trace them. And there’s no indication up to now that the Paris assaults, which killed 129, may have been stopped by different methods, safety specialists mentioned. The Islamic State has claimed accountability, nevertheless it’s nonetheless not but recognized how the assaults have been deliberate and the way they could have been disrupted.

    “I don’t assume it’s honest,” mentioned Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Mission on Authorities Secrecy, of Brennan’s remarks. “It’s untimely at finest and it might be fully incorrect. And it’s not clear to what extent surveillance would or may or did make a distinction.” He added: “It’s not as if folks wanted Snowden with the intention to understand that governments, together with the U.S., collect intelligence or try to anticipate and defeat assaults on their nation. That’s a given.”

    Since Snowden’s disclosures in 2013, the U.S. authorities has defended the applications, arguing that they’ve disrupted terror assaults. A presidential evaluate board set as much as consider each applications discovered privateness issues with every program, and examined their effectiveness. It famous that Part 702, which permits the gathering of web and cellphone knowledge for non-U.S. individuals, “has instantly enabled the thwarting of particular terrorist assaults, aimed toward the USA and at different nations.”

    One of many incidents officers have pointed to is the 2008 assaults in Mumbai, wherein gunmen killed 166 folks. A report by FRONTLINE and ProPublica discovered that regardless that intelligence officers have been in a position to monitor a key plotter within the assault, the data wasn’t carefully analyzed in time to forestall the bloodbath.

    The identical board discovered “minimal worth” in Part 215, this system that gathers bulk phone knowledge on U.S. residents. “Now we have not recognized a single occasion involving a menace to the USA wherein this system made a concrete distinction within the end result of a counterterrorism investigation,” it mentioned. “Furthermore, we’re conscious of no occasion wherein this system instantly contributed to the invention of a beforehand unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist assault.”

    Within the meantime, the disclosures have led to new oversight and a few adjustments to the applications. In two weeks, a provision of the brand new USA Freedom Act takes impact that forestalls the NSA from amassing and storing American cellphone knowledge in bulk.

    That knowledge will nonetheless be retained, however now will probably be saved by the cellphone firms as a substitute, shared with the federal government solely upon authorization. Information for non-U.S. residents will nonetheless be collected by the federal government.

    A girl walks previous a banner displayed in help of former US spy Edward Snowden in Hong Kong on June 18, 2013. (Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty Photos)