Ben McAdams and Evan McMullin proclaim themselves pragmatists once they say Democrats mustn’t run any candidate in opposition to Sen. Mike Lee.
Let’s look at how various things can be with a hypothetical McMullin. The crucial vote within the Senate falls to Manchin and Sinema, neither of whom are up on this cycle. Democrats have to flip a minimum of 2 seats from Republican to Democrat to vary that dynamic.
Let’s put numbers to this. Say in opposition to midterm norms of the occasion within the White Home dropping seats, the Democrats maintain their 48 seats and a couple of independents that caucus with the Democrats and the Republicans win 49, with McMullin upsetting Lee. Even when McMullin helps filibuster reform nothing modifications as a result of the vote is 49 (46 Democrats, 3 independents, together with McMullin) – 51 (49 Republicans plus Manchin/Sinema). Consequently, no voting rights laws passes.
If only one present Democrat loses his or her seat and McMullin wins, the Senate stands at 49 (47 Democrats and a couple of independents) – 50 Republicans and 1 McMullin, who has stated he gained’t caucus with both occasion. In that case, Sen. McConnell is majority chief, the identical end result as if Sen. Lee had been to win.
Impeachment? That requires 67 votes. Until McMullin convinces 16 Republicans – solely 7 voted to convict in January 2021 – that also gained’t occur.
However, McMullin opposes the Reasonably priced Care Act and extra. He’s the identical vote as Lee on tax cuts that may be handed through reconciliation. Lee voted for McMullin for president in 2016! McMullin is not any totally different than Lee in substantive outcomes as long as the crucial votes are Sinema/Manchin.
With the excellence, then, between Mike Lee and Mike Lee-lite, we want a Democrat’s voice, Kael Weston’s voice, within the Senate race.
Brent Liddle, Salt Lake Metropolis
Submit a letter to the editor