Krackhardt, D. & Kilduff, M. Whether or not shut or far: social distance results on perceived stability in friendship networks. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 770–782 (1999).
Google Scholar
Davis, J. A. In Theories of Cognitive Consistency (eds Abelson, R. P. et al.) 544–550 (Rand McNally, 1968).
Heider, F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Wiley, 1958).
DeSoto, C. B. Studying a social construction. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 60, 417–421 (1960).
Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. Filling within the blanks: a concept of cognitive classes and the construction of social affiliation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 55, 118–127 (1992).
Google Scholar
Rand, D. G. et al. Social heuristics form intuitive cooperation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3677 (2014).
Google Scholar
Holoien, D. S., Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N. & Alegre, J. M. Do you actually perceive? Attaining accuracy in interracial relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108, 76–92 (2015).
Google Scholar
Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L. & Gilovich, T. Perspective taking as selfish anchoring and adjustment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 327–339 (2004).
Google Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. How we all know—and typically misjudge—what others know: imputing one’s personal information to others. Psychol. Bull. 125, 737–759 (1999).
Google Scholar
Gilovich, T., Savitsky, Ok. & Medvec, V. H. The phantasm of transparency: biased assessments of others’ means to learn one’s emotional states. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 332–346 (1998).
Google Scholar
Gilovich, T. & Savitsky, Ok. The highlight impact and the phantasm of transparency: selfish assessments of how we’re seen by others. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 8, 165–168 (1999).
Google Scholar
Milgram, S. The expertise of residing in cities. Science 167, 1461–1468 (1970).
Google Scholar
Diener, E., Fraser, S. C., Beaman, A. L. & Kelem, R. T. Results of deindividuation variables on stealing amongst Halloween trick-or-treaters. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 33, 178–183 (1976).
Google Scholar
Zhong, C., Bohns, V. Ok. & Gino, F. Good lamps are the very best police: darkness will increase dishonesty and self-interested conduct. Psychol. Sci. 21, 311–314 (2010).
Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. & Petrie, R. Public items experiments with out confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising. J. Public Econ. 88, 1605–1623 (2004).
Google Scholar
Yoeli, E., Hoffman, M., Rand, D. & Nowak, M. Powering up with oblique reciprocity in a large-scale discipline experiment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10424–10429 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D. & Bateson, M. Results of eye photos on on a regular basis cooperative conduct: a discipline experiment. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32, 172–178 (2011).
Google Scholar
Pronin, E., Kruger, J., Savitsky, Ok. & Ross, L. You don’t know me, however I do know you: the phantasm of uneven perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 639–656 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lakens, D. Equivalence exams: a sensible primer for t exams, correlations, and meta-analyses. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8, 355–362 (2017).
Google Scholar
Preacher, Ok. J., Rucker, D. D. & Hayes, A. F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: concept, strategies, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42, 185–227 (2007).
Google Scholar
Parks, R. B., Mastrofski, S. D., DeJong, C. & Grey, M. Ok. How officers spend their time with the group. Justice Q. 16, 483–518 (1999).
Google Scholar
Ba, B. A., Knox, D., Mummolo, J. & Rivera, R. The function of officer race and gender in police-civilian interactions in Chicago. Science 371, 696–702 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fryer, R. G. An empirical evaluation of racial variations in police use of pressure. J. Pol. Econ. 127, 1210–1261 (2019).
Google Scholar
Voigt, R. et al. Language from police physique digital camera footage exhibits racial disparities in officer respect. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6521–6526 (2017).
Google Scholar
Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V. & Hureau, D. M. The results of scorching spots policing on crime: an up to date systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. Justice Q. 31, 633–663 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nationwide Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medication. Proactive Policing: Results on Crime and Communities (The Nationwide Academies Press, 2018).
Nationwide Analysis Council. Equity and Effectiveness in Policing: The Proof (The Nationwide Academies Press, 2004).
Sherman, L. W. & Eck, J. in Proof Primarily based Crime Prevention (eds Sherman, L. W. et al.) 295–329 (Routledge, 2002).
Peyton, Ok., Sierra-Arévalo, M. & Rand, D. G. A discipline experiment on group policing and police legitimacy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19894–19898 (2019).
Google Scholar
Owens, E., Weisburd, D., Amendola, Ok. L. & Alpert, G. P. Are you able to construct a greater cop? Experimental proof on supervision, coaching, and policing locally. Criminol. Public Coverage 17, 41–87 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sunshine, J. & Tyler, T. The function of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public help for policing. Legislation Soc. Rev. 37, 513–548 (2003).
Google Scholar
Chalfin, C., Hansen, B., Weisburst, E. Ok. & Williams, M. C. Police pressure measurement and civilian race. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights (within the press).
Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V. & Hansen, C. Excessive-dimensional strategies and inference on structural and therapy results. J. Econ. Perspect. 28, 29–50 (2014).
Google Scholar