‘The world has changed’: U. political science professor analyzes Putin’s next moves in Ukraine


A Ukrainian serviceman holds a rocket-propelled grenade launcher at combating positions outdoors the town of Kharkiv, Ukraine on Thursday. As Russian troops intensify their assault on Ukraine and its individuals, it is tough to find out what’s going to occur subsequent. (Maksim Levin, Reuters)

Estimated learn time: 2-3 minutes

SALT LAKE CITY — As Russian troops intensify their assault on Ukraine and its individuals, it is tough to find out what’s going to occur subsequent. Occupation presents long-term challenges for Russia, and a political science professor from the College of Utah stated the Ukrainians have fought for his or her independence earlier than.

“Ukraine has a convention of combating for its independence,” stated political science professor Marjorie Fortress, who has studied that a part of the world for a number of a long time.

She stated the worldwide political order has been comparatively secure in Jap Europe over the past 50 plus years. Now, it has been fractured in a matter of days. The Russian invasion of Ukraine dramatically, and rapidly, modified the regional steadiness of energy. Fortress believes uncertainty is as excessive as it has been in a very long time.

“We do not know what Putin’s plans for Ukraine are,” she stated.

It stays unclear how a lot of the nation Russian President Vladimir Putin intends to manage.

“It appears sadly sure that he could also be planning to arrange a puppet regime,” Fortress stated.

The political science professor characterised that as a miserable and darkish chance, “given Ukraine’s measurement, given its significance, given Ukraine’s hard-won democracy,” she stated.

Regardless of Russia’s navy may, Fortress factors out that occupying a neighboring nation is difficult and costly. If there are Ukrainians prepared to assist Putin set up a regime, it might be more cost effective politically and financially.

“If that seems to be tough, then I believe that he’s going to have a really onerous, lengthy, costly slog with it,” she stated.

Fortress cited a current survey of Ukrainians that reveals almost 60% are prepared to personally, actively resist a Russian invasion.

We can’t assume that Putin goals to rebuild the Soviet Union. However, the invasion of Ukraine raises that query.

“I agree that he does not need to reassemble the Soviet Union,” Fortress stated. “However, his imaginative and prescient of Russian safety, Russian prosperity, Russia taking the place that it ought to take on the earth requires dominating its neighbors.”

Which leaves the U.S. and its allies very nervous.

“The world has modified, and we’re going through a huge quantity of uncertainty, each about what’s going to occur in Ukraine, and in regards to the worldwide order.”

Associated Tales

Jed Boal

Extra tales you might be excited about

OSHA, citing Covid failures, moves to strip three states of workplace safety authority.


The Occupational Security and Well being Administration stated Tuesday that it was taking steps that might strip three states — Arizona, South Carolina and Utah — of their authority to control office security, citing shortcomings in insurance policies on coronavirus safety.

Beneath federal regulation, states can assume accountability for occupational security if the federal government approves their plan for doing so and if the plan stays at the very least as efficient as federal enforcement.

Federal officers stated Tuesday that the three states had did not undertake a rule that OSHA issued in June — or to undertake one at the very least as efficient — requiring sure Covid-related security measures by employers, like offering protecting tools.

“OSHA has labored in good religion to assist these three state plans come into compliance,” Jim Frederick, the company’s performing director, stated on a convention name. “However their continued refusal is a failure to keep up their state plan dedication to 1000’s of employees of their state.”

Emily H. Farr, the director of South Carolina’s Division of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, expressed disappointment within the motion, saying that the state’s program had “confirmed efficient as South Carolina has constantly had one of many lowest harm and sickness charges within the nation.”

Arizona’s governor, Doug Ducey, stated in an announcement that its office security regulator had informed OSHA that it believed the state was already in compliance with the brand new rule and that it had promptly initiated a rule-making course of to “overview the mandate” as soon as the federal company knowledgeable the state that it was not in compliance.

Gov. Spencer J. Cox of Utah stated in an announcement that the state had beforehand expressed concern to the Labor Division that the rule would place an undue burden on the well being care trade. The state rejected the conclusion that its plan was much less efficient than the federal plan.

Twenty-eight states or territories have OSHA-approved plans for implementing office security. The place no plan has been accepted, OSHA retains major authority.

The motion comes as OSHA prepares to launch a rule mandating that firms with 100 or extra employees require staff to be vaccinated or to undergo weekly Covid-19 testing. Some states have indicated that they may problem the rule, although the authorized foundation for doing so seems weak.

OSHA, which is a part of the Labor Division, will publish a discover within the Federal Register saying its proposal to rethink and revoke approval of the three states’ self-regulation plans. There will probably be a 35-day remark interval on the proposal earlier than it may be finalized.

Seema Nanda, the Labor Division solicitor, stated that on account of the method, the states’ authority to control office security might be revoked completely or partially, reminiscent of for sure industries.

Utah lawmaker moves to further limit media access to lawmakers at Capitol


The measure is sort of similar to a guidelines decision authorized by Utah Senate Republicans final week.

Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune Stephanie Burdick of Salt Lake Metropolis units up a gathering for Thursday with Rep. Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, who voted in opposition to SB96 in the course of the Home Enterprise and Labor Committee vote, Feb. 6, 2019.

A Taylorsville Republican filed a guidelines decision on Thursday to restrict media entry to lawmakers on the Home ground — an identical measure authorized by Utah Senate Republicans final week.

The measure, HR2, sponsored by state Rep. James Dunnigan, would require credentialed reporters to get the permission of the Home of Representatives speaker or the speaker’s “designee” to “conduct and file” interviews with lawmakers within the Home chamber, gallery, lounge, halls and committee rooms.

HR2 would additionally forestall journalists from standing behind a committee room dais with out the approval of a committee chair. Photographers and videographers have usually stood behind the dais throughout committee hearings to seize the face of a person who’s testifying for or in opposition to a invoice.

Moreover, the proposed guidelines decision would require journalists to get approval from Home speaker permission to enter Home committee rooms, in line with the measure’s textual content. It’s unclear how that will probably be enforced as legislative committee rooms are open to the general public.

“After all committee hearings are open to the general public, we stream them for the general public to take part in,” Home Speaker Brad Wilson advised reporters on Friday. “There was some query round the place we’re placing cameras and the disruption that happens typically in committee hearings. In order that’s one of many issues we’ve been attempting to work via.”

If handed, the hassle would change the best way reporters have communicated with lawmakers at Utah’s Capitol.

Dunnigan didn’t instantly reply to a request for touch upon Thursday night.

“When conducting an interview within the Home chamber, the information media might enter the chamber for the aim of conducting a selected interview and shall exit the chamber promptly after finishing the interview,” in line with the proposed rule change.

The measure is sort of similar to a guidelines decision authorized by Utah Senate Republicans final week. State Sen. Mike McKell, R-Spanish Fork, who sponsored that laws beforehand stated the measure would set up clear guidelines over media entry and deal with safety considerations within the Senate.

As a result of it’s a guidelines decision, the measure would solely require a two-thirds vote from the Home of Representatives to cross.

Signal-up for The Day by day Buzz Podcast

the daily buzz logo